Driver training changes raise ‘serious’ safety concerns

The trade body says Government proposals to reform driver training also raise serious safety concerns.

The DfT launched a consultation on proposed changes to the Driver Certificate of Professional Competence (DCPC), onThursday, March 2.

Ministers say changes to driver training rules for HGV, bus and coach drivers would be aimed at making it cheaper, shorter and more effective.

The Driver CPC or DCPC was originally introduced by the EU and is required to be held by lorry, bus, coach, and minibus drivers in addition to their driving licence.

Having left the EU, the Government is exploring how it could improve the testing regime in order to increase choice for drivers, safeguard road safety, and support the industry in retaining and recruiting staff.

The key changes include reforms to the lengthy training format, more flexibility with e-learning and a shorter ‘new periodic test’ which could save employees time and companies up to £460 per test in early DfT estimates.

Reforms to training as well as the new cheaper and shorter periodic test will offer an accelerated route for former drivers to return to the sector more easily, ministers claim.

However, Chris Yarsley, senior policy manager for road freight regulation at Logistics UK, said: “Logistics is a highly regulated industry that places the safety of all road users at the heart of its operations and any changes to the Driver CPC regime must respect that premise.”

‘Bad news’ for road safety

Yarsley labelled the proposed changes as “bad news” for road safety and haulage operators, as well as drivers.

“Within its own consultation announcement, DfT has said that much of the current industry training relates to issues impacting safety, and that the new, proposed periodic test – which would replace the current 35 hours of periodic training – could result in significantly less training being offered and, therefore, available overall,” he said.

“Operating and driving heavy commercial vehicles is a challenging, complex role and to reduce the training opportunities for drivers when they need to be operating in line with the safest possible practices is simply unacceptable and could compromise the vital safety on which much of our industry is based.”

DfT has also indicated that the proposals would result in more complexity within the DCPC regime itself, including a two-tier system for domestic and foreign driving qualifications, and that the new regime tabled would create confusion for drivers, leading to switching of courses, and therefore increased training time and costs.

“The department’s own plan states that these changes have the potential to create higher overheads, ‘which would most likely be borne by drivers of employers in the form of test and possibly training fees’ – an unacceptable burden to place on our members,” continued Yarsley.

Logistics businesses have already faced a 12.6% rise in vehicle operating costs, are facing a reduction in energy support and are investing in decarbonisation technologies in line with Government targets.

“Already operating on narrow margins, these businesses cannot continue to absorb yet more rising and unnecessary costs, which would ultimately be passed on to consumers,” he added.

“The logistics industry has worked hard to ease the critical driver shortage that dominated headlines in 2021 via awareness campaigns such as Generation Logistics, and the creation of HGV Driver Bootcamps to boost recruitment.

“At a time when industry is trying to attract more people into the sector, and into such highly skilled jobs, any reduction in the professionalism required for the role would be a retrograde step and would devalue the skilled nature of the work required.

“Our members have never questioned the need for a Driver CPC regime and welcome the reputation which attaining the current standard bestows on their businesses and their drivers.”

When providing a response to the DfT review of the training in January 2022, Logistics UK called for the flexibility for businesses to deliver the training most suitable to their own drivers to be retained.

Yarsley concluded: “Logistics is not a ‘one size fits all’ sector and there are huge advantages to businesses being able to tailor the drivers’ training content to suit their business needs.

“The proposed periodic test will potentially cover a wide range of issues, some of which might not be relevant to the driver, so could direct attention away from training that matters.

“Logistics UK will be undertaking urgent work with its members to respond to these proposals and identify worthwhile methods to improve, rather than compromise, road safety, while increasing efficiency for businesses and the wider economy.”

Latest Stories